2026 FIFA World CupLive

10 AI models.
104 matches.
Who predicted best?

We gave 10 leading AI models the same brief: predict every match of the 2026 FIFA World Cup — group stage through the final. Each model answered a short calibration interview to set its own methodology, then submitted 104 scoreline predictions and a full academic research paper. As matches are played, this leaderboard scores them automatically. Every prediction is locked in — no updates allowed.

♛ AI Prode · Benchmark Leader

After 104 scored matches, Claude Opus 4.8 leads the benchmark with 95 pts — the best-performing prediction model so far. From the Round of 32 onward, we're tracking it live: predicting each knockout round after seeing the actual qualifiers.

Follow the live bracket →
Task brief ↓What each model was asked to doData schema ↓The exact JSON format requiredPaper template ↓Research paper structure
104matches scored
0remaining
104total matches
10models competing
LeaderboardExact score = 3 pts · Correct result = 1 pt · Miss = 0
#ModelExact scoreCorrect resultMissPointsBreakdown
♛184145
95pts
18 exact41 win45 miss
♛A Posteriori Bracket · Claude Opus 4.8 predicts the knockouts liveLive Track
2105242
82pts
10 exact52 win42 miss
3114151
74pts
11 exact41 win51 miss
461314
31pts
6 exact13 win14 miss
55920
24pts
5 exact9 win20 miss
631219
21pts
3 exact12 win19 miss
721419
20pts
2 exact14 win19 miss
821419
20pts
2 exact14 win19 miss
93131
10pts
3 exact1 win31 miss
1001024
10pts
0 exact10 win24 miss
Exact score
Correct result
Miss
104 of 104 matches scored · updated on each deploy
Group Stage Complete
Claude Opus 4.8 leads after the group stage

The leaderboard above shows a priori performance — predictions every model locked in before a single ball was kicked. Claude Opus 4.8 leads with the most points after the group stage.

Starting from the Round of 32, we're running a parallel live experiment: Claude Opus 4.8 will predict each knockout round after seeing the actual qualifiers — applying the same methodology, but with real results known.

View A Posteriori Bracket →
Model Context Protocol
Connect your AI assistant to live World Cup data
Ask Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, or any MCP-compatible tool about predictions, scores, and rankings.
Connect Your AI →
Instructions given to all models

Every model received the same brief, data schema, and paper template before producing its predictions.

view original ↗

Instructions for AI-Driven World Cup 2026 End-to-End Predictive Analysis

Objective

You are a Lead Sports Data Scientist and Predictive Algorithm Engineer. Your goal is to design an independent, mathematically rigorous predictive methodology to calculate probabilities and exact scorelines for the ENTIRE 2026 FIFA World Cup. This includes all 72 Group Stage matches AND the complete 32-match Knockout Bracket (Round of 32, Round of 16, Quarterfinals, Semifinals, Third-Place Playoff, and the Grand Final)—totaling exactly 104 matches.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Pre-Requisites & Templates

To ensure standardized ingestion for our comparison engine, you MUST use two external blueprint templates to format your final output:

  1. paper_template.md: Outlines the structural hierarchy of your academic research report.
  2. data_schema.md: Dictates the exact JSON schema required for programmatic parsing.

If the user has not provided the content of paper_template.md and data_schema.md in the current context, you MUST NOT begin the simulation. Stop immediately and explicitly request the user to provide those template files.

IMPORTANT: Output format MUST be .md for the research, and the specified json schema for the results. It's also mandatory you to identify yourself with your Brand, Model and version (for instance Gemini 1.5 Pro).

STOP: Initial Interview Phase Required

Do not assume or hallucinate baseline parameters. Before executing any mathematical model or outputting data, you must conduct a brief technical interview with the user. Stop your process and ask the user to clarify the following operational constraints:

  1. Predictive Weights: How much relative weight should be assigned to recent Continental Tournaments (e.g., Euro, Copa América) vs. historical World Cup performance?
  2. Home-Field Coefficient: How aggressively should the model scale the home-field advantage parameter () for the three host nations (USA, Mexico, Canada)?
  3. Exogenous Variables: Should the model factor in club-level player fatigue (minutes played in Europe) or travel/climate friction? (Keep in mind the USA hosts 78 matches, while Canada and Mexico host 13 each).

Once the user answers this interview, you will proceed to the execution phase using their inputs to calibrate your algorithms.

Tournament Rules & Structure (48-Team Format, 104 Matches)

  1. Group Stage: 12 groups (A through L) of 4 teams each. Each group plays 6 matches (72 matches total).
  2. Knockout Qualification: The top 2 teams from each group (24 teams) plus the 8 best 3rd-place teams advance to the Round of 32.
  3. Bracket Logic: For the knockout stages (32 matches total), your model must simulate matches sequentially. The winners of your predicted group stages MUST populate the Round of 32 bracket. You must assume your predictions are correct as the tournament progresses to establish a definitive, baseline a priori champion.
  4. Knockout Scorelines: Predicted scores for the knockout rounds must reflect the scoreline at the end of the match determining who advances (either 90 minutes, 120 minutes, or a designated penalty shootout winner if a draw is predicted).

Final Deliverables (Post-Interview Execution)

You must provide exactly two outputs in your final response:

  1. Academic-Style Research Paper: A comprehensive Markdown document conforming strictly to paper_template.md. It must contain the math, equations, and visual probability density matrices.
  2. Standardized JSON Dataset: A raw, valid JSON block mapping your exact scoreline predictions and advancement paths for all 104 matches, adhering strictly to data_schema.md.

Strict Operational Guidelines

  • No Truncation or Placeholders: You must calculate and output the exact scorelines and parameters for all 104 matches. Do not truncate the data with ellipses (...).
  • LaTeX Implementation: All statistical frameworks, parameter estimations, and distribution algorithms must be fully written using standard LaTeX notation ($$).
  • Valid JSON: The JSON must be raw text, fully parsable, and contain no markdown wrappers inside the JSON block itself.