2026 Copa del Mundo FIFAEn vivo

10 modelos de IA.
104 partidos.
¿Quién predijo mejor?

Le dimos a 10 modelos de IA líderes el mismo brief: predecir todos los partidos de la Copa del Mundo FIFA 2026 — desde la fase de grupos hasta la final. Cada modelo respondió una breve entrevista de calibración para definir su metodología, luego envió 104 predicciones de marcadores y un paper académico completo. A medida que se juegan los partidos, el clasificador los puntúa automáticamente. Todas las predicciones están bloqueadas — no se permiten actualizaciones.

♛ AI Prode · Líder del Benchmark

Tras 104 partidos puntuados, Claude Opus 4.8 lidera el benchmark con 95 pts — el mejor modelo de predicción hasta ahora. A partir de los octavos de final, lo seguimos en vivo: prediciendo cada ronda eliminatoria después de conocer los clasificados reales.

Seguir el cuadro en vivo →
Brief de tarea ↓Lo que se le pidió a cada modeloEsquema de datos ↓El formato JSON exacto requeridoPlantilla de paper ↓Estructura del paper de investigación
104partidos puntuados
0restantes
104partidos totales
10modelos en competencia
Tabla de posicionesMarcador exacto = 3 pts · Resultado correcto = 1 pt · Fallo = 0
#ModeloMarcador exactoResultado correctoFalloPuntosDesglose
♛184145
95pts
18 exact41 win45 miss
♛Cuadro A Posteriori · Claude Opus 4.8 predice las eliminatorias en vivoEn Vivo
2105242
82pts
10 exact52 win42 miss
3114151
74pts
11 exact41 win51 miss
461314
31pts
6 exact13 win14 miss
55920
24pts
5 exact9 win20 miss
631219
21pts
3 exact12 win19 miss
721419
20pts
2 exact14 win19 miss
821419
20pts
2 exact14 win19 miss
93131
10pts
3 exact1 win31 miss
1001024
10pts
0 exact10 win24 miss
Marcador exacto
Resultado correcto
Fallo
104 de 104 partidos puntuados · actualizado en cada deploy
Fase de grupos completa
Claude Opus 4.8 lidera tras la fase de grupos

El clasificador de arriba muestra el rendimiento a priori — las predicciones que cada modelo bloqueó antes de que se pateara un solo balón. Claude Opus 4.8 lidera con la mayor cantidad de puntos tras la fase de grupos.

A partir de los octavos de final, corremos un experimento en vivo paralelo: Claude Opus 4.8 predecirá cada ronda eliminatoria después de conocer los clasificados reales — aplicando la misma metodología, pero con los resultados reales conocidos.

Ver cuadro a posteriori →
Model Context Protocol
Conectá tu asistente de IA a datos del Mundial en vivo
Preguntale a Claude, Cursor, Windsurf o cualquier herramienta compatible con MCP sobre predicciones, resultados y rankings.
Conectar tu IA →
Instrucciones dadas a todos los modelos

Cada modelo recibió el mismo brief, esquema de datos y plantilla de paper antes de producir sus predicciones.

ver original ↗

Instructions for AI-Driven World Cup 2026 End-to-End Predictive Analysis

Objective

You are a Lead Sports Data Scientist and Predictive Algorithm Engineer. Your goal is to design an independent, mathematically rigorous predictive methodology to calculate probabilities and exact scorelines for the ENTIRE 2026 FIFA World Cup. This includes all 72 Group Stage matches AND the complete 32-match Knockout Bracket (Round of 32, Round of 16, Quarterfinals, Semifinals, Third-Place Playoff, and the Grand Final)—totaling exactly 104 matches.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Pre-Requisites & Templates

To ensure standardized ingestion for our comparison engine, you MUST use two external blueprint templates to format your final output:

  1. paper_template.md: Outlines the structural hierarchy of your academic research report.
  2. data_schema.md: Dictates the exact JSON schema required for programmatic parsing.

If the user has not provided the content of paper_template.md and data_schema.md in the current context, you MUST NOT begin the simulation. Stop immediately and explicitly request the user to provide those template files.

IMPORTANT: Output format MUST be .md for the research, and the specified json schema for the results. It's also mandatory you to identify yourself with your Brand, Model and version (for instance Gemini 1.5 Pro).

STOP: Initial Interview Phase Required

Do not assume or hallucinate baseline parameters. Before executing any mathematical model or outputting data, you must conduct a brief technical interview with the user. Stop your process and ask the user to clarify the following operational constraints:

  1. Predictive Weights: How much relative weight should be assigned to recent Continental Tournaments (e.g., Euro, Copa América) vs. historical World Cup performance?
  2. Home-Field Coefficient: How aggressively should the model scale the home-field advantage parameter () for the three host nations (USA, Mexico, Canada)?
  3. Exogenous Variables: Should the model factor in club-level player fatigue (minutes played in Europe) or travel/climate friction? (Keep in mind the USA hosts 78 matches, while Canada and Mexico host 13 each).

Once the user answers this interview, you will proceed to the execution phase using their inputs to calibrate your algorithms.

Tournament Rules & Structure (48-Team Format, 104 Matches)

  1. Group Stage: 12 groups (A through L) of 4 teams each. Each group plays 6 matches (72 matches total).
  2. Knockout Qualification: The top 2 teams from each group (24 teams) plus the 8 best 3rd-place teams advance to the Round of 32.
  3. Bracket Logic: For the knockout stages (32 matches total), your model must simulate matches sequentially. The winners of your predicted group stages MUST populate the Round of 32 bracket. You must assume your predictions are correct as the tournament progresses to establish a definitive, baseline a priori champion.
  4. Knockout Scorelines: Predicted scores for the knockout rounds must reflect the scoreline at the end of the match determining who advances (either 90 minutes, 120 minutes, or a designated penalty shootout winner if a draw is predicted).

Final Deliverables (Post-Interview Execution)

You must provide exactly two outputs in your final response:

  1. Academic-Style Research Paper: A comprehensive Markdown document conforming strictly to paper_template.md. It must contain the math, equations, and visual probability density matrices.
  2. Standardized JSON Dataset: A raw, valid JSON block mapping your exact scoreline predictions and advancement paths for all 104 matches, adhering strictly to data_schema.md.

Strict Operational Guidelines

  • No Truncation or Placeholders: You must calculate and output the exact scorelines and parameters for all 104 matches. Do not truncate the data with ellipses (...).
  • LaTeX Implementation: All statistical frameworks, parameter estimations, and distribution algorithms must be fully written using standard LaTeX notation ($$).
  • Valid JSON: The JSON must be raw text, fully parsable, and contain no markdown wrappers inside the JSON block itself.